| But my point IS to further the information here and to do my best to see that it is accurate...at least to as far as I know. My delivery may be harsh at times, but I have always been open to correction, so if that needs to happen, then by all means do it. With the recent influx of newbs, I didn't want them to think that Haken's choice of dual POP modification was a suitable and ample replacement for the JWT dual pop, or perhaps even the DOOLZ. I don't have any flow data, but I would wager that his ghetto setup is not that much better than a single pop charger. I understand he is eliminating the restriction of the single MAF, but the lack of velocity stacks will make an impact. If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong and will accept that if it comes to it. But I would rather question it, and make him and others think about it logically, and be wrong, than to have 30 kids come in here and post about the dual intake on ebay and how they are going to get HUGE power from it. And from my standpoint, it's not necessarily about HP gains as it is about efficiency and consistancy. I wouldn't trust any so called 'velocity stacks' from ebay to provide me with either of those factors. Thats my main point here. I'm not faulting him for going with a dual pop setup, because I know it is necessary in the mod path for big power. I'm faulting him for his choice of parts and acting like it is top shelf.
Later,
Spencer
AIM: sbsTT14 PETZ member #4 '91 300ZX TT Stage IV+
'96 Jeep Cherokee Sport 
"That's what it's all about bro. Definition. Don't under estimate the sexyness of a well pimped car. When the bitches are giving me BJ's on the freeway I won't regret a loud exhaust and a phat wing." - ZX-man 21:37:53 10/29/03 "sometimes the older seems stupider" - KuZa 20:20:44 10/22/03 "gotta admit, i do like sac." - Chris(NJ) 15:28:40 05/16/03 "It is just a car, and this is just a message board. Grow up, live your life, quit stressing out about trivial shit." - Steve Simmons 01:51:03 05/24/03 |
